The material contained on Artisan Canvas represents the views and opinions of the authors. Material written by any particular individual may or may not reflect the views and opinions of Artisan Partners or its associates. The material contained on this site may contain forward-looking statements regarding future events and future performance, as well as management’s current expectations, beliefs, plans, estimates, or projections. Forward-looking statements regarding Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. and its subsidiaries are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those factors described within “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the SEC on February 18, 2020, as such factors may be updated from time to time. The views and opinions expressed in this material are based on market conditions as of the date indicated and are subject to change without notice. While this information is believed to be reliable, there is no guarantee to the accuracy or completeness of any statement in the discussion.
This website does not constitute an offer or recommendation by Artisan Partners of securities or services to, or a solicitation by Artisan Partners of an offer of services or to buy, sell or hold securities. Artisan Partners and the authors noted herein may have financial interests, through investment vehicles or personal investments, in any themes, trends, companies or securities discussed. Materials on this website are informational only and should not be taken as investment recommendation or advice of any kind whatsoever (whether impartial or otherwise). Investing is subject to risks, which include the potential for fluctuations in investment value and loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used to create indices or financial products. This report is not approved or produced by MSCI. Frank Russell Company ("Russell") is the source and owner of the trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell® is a trademark of Frank Russell Company. Neither Russell nor its licensors accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the Russell Indexes and/or Russell ratings or underlying data and no party may rely on any Russell Indexes and/or Russell ratings and/or underlying data contained in this communication. No further distribution of Russell Data is permitted without Russell's express written consent. Russell does not promote, sponsor or endorse the content of this communication. The herein referenced S&P index(es) ("Index") is a product of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC ("S&P DJI") and/or its affiliates and has been licensed for use. Copyright © 2023 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global, Inc. All rights reserved. Redistribution or reproduction in whole or in part is prohibited without written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. S&P® is a registered trademark of S&P Global and Dow Jones® is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC ("Dow Jones"). None of S&P DJI, Dow Jones, their affiliates or third party licensors make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the ability of any index to accurately represent the asset class or market sector that it purports to represent and none shall have any liability for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of any index or the data included therein. Source ICE Data Indices, LLC, used with permission. ICE Data Indices, LLC permits use of the ICE BofAML indices and related data on an "as is" basis, makes no warranties regarding same, does not guarantee the suitability, quality, accuracy, timeliness and/or completeness of the ICE BofAML indices or any data included in, related to, or derived therefrom, assumes no liability in connection with the use of the foregoing, and does not sponsor, endorse, or recommend Artisan Partners or any of its products or services.
© 2023 Artisan Partners. All rights reserved.
Are You Getting the Right Non-US Exposure?
Tepid economic growth in the post financial crisis decade left investors searching for companies that could stand out from the market by disproportionately growing their profits. The technology-centric US economy became the preferred destination for capital, with profit growth far exceeding its non-US peers (Exhibit 1). This rise in profits combined with more multiple expansion drove US equities to deliver over 600bps of higher annual returns and higher returns on equity (Exhibit 1). That said, it might be appropriate for investors to sharpen their pencils and give their non-US equity exposure a closer look given the price being paid for US profit growth appears a bit stretched today, and past performance is not indicative of future results (Exhibit 2).
Exhibit 1: Superior EPS Growth and Multiple Expansion Drove a Decade of US Equity Outperformance
EPS Growth CAGR
FY2 PE Multiple (7/1/2009)
FY2 PE Multiple (2/29/2020)
Average Annual ROE
Average Net Debt/
EBITDA
Total Return CAGR1
MSCI USA
7.9%
12.0x
17.2x
14.4%
1.6x
13.9%
MSCI ACWI
Ex US
2.2%
12.2x
13.2x
10.4%
1.8x
7.8%
Variance
5.7%
-0.2x
4.0x
4.0%
-0.2x
6.1%
1.Represents trailing twelve-month data from 6/30/10 to 2/29/20.
Source: Artisan Partners/FactSet/MSCI. Figures represent the economic expansion from 7/1/09 to 2/29/20. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Current performance and data will vary from what is shown.
Exhibit 2: The Price Being Paid for Domestic Earnings Growth is Above Its Historical Average Today
Source: Factset/MSCI. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Current data will vary from what is shown.
A Pervasive Home Country Bias
US dominance appears to have led US financial professionals to steer their clients to invest primarily at home. As of June 2020, US financial professionals have allocated roughly 75% of their clients’ portfolios to domestic equities (Exhibit 3). While it is difficult to determine what the appropriate mix should be, particularly given varying degrees of risk tolerance and suitability, average returns over the past decade may have been strong enough to lead financial professionals to prefer US equities. However, this focus on US investing could have led these same investors to overlook investment opportunities in non-US domiciled companies.
Exhibit 3: Non-US Equity Exposures Do Not Align with GDP Distribution
Source: BlackRock as of August 25, 2020.
Top Performing Stocks in the MSCI AC World Index Have Been Domiciled Outside of the US
Since 2010, the majority of the top 50 performing stocks in the MSCI AC World Index (ACWI)—designed to track broad global equity-market performance and a benchmark for $4 trillion of global equity assets—were domiciled outside of the US (74% on average for any given year). These same non-US companies within the top 50 tended to be in the consumer discretionary, industrials and financials sectors; located in emerging markets; mid-caps; and these stocks delivered average annual total returns well ahead of US equities in general (Exhibit 4).
Exhibit 4: MSCI USA Total Return vs Non-US Equities in the Top 50 Performing ACWI Stocks
Source: Artisan Partners/FactSet/MSCI. As of 31 Dec 2020. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Drawbacks of Investment Strategies Closely Resembling the ACWI
Attempting to gain exposure to the top performing non-US stocks by investing in vehicles or strategies closely resembling the ACWI’s market-capitalization and country allocation methodology has its drawbacks. Foremost, this approach lacks flexibility to adjust to broader market conditions and company specific developments. The ACWI’s capitalization-weighted approach—which is mostly static year-to-year—does not always align with the opportunity set. In addition, US domiciled companies represent 60% of the weight in the ACWI, and nine of the top 10 largest holdings have been US-domiciled over the past decade. With the top 10 holdings representing roughly 15% of the overall index and primarily concentrated within the US information technology sector, investors who are seeking to diversify their portfolios towards a global allocation could be unknowingly overexposed to US-domiciled companies. Lastly, the ACWI’s top 50 performing non-US stocks had an average weight of just 0.6% over the past decade, limiting their contribution to the index’s overall performance.
Unconstrained Fundamental-Oriented Investment Strategies Could Help
An unconstrained bottom-up global investment strategy could provide a better way to gain exposure to non-US domiciled companies. Over the past two economic expansions, profit growth has been the primary driver of stock prices. This bodes well for skilled investment managers who can identify company-specific profit drivers through bottom-up fundamental analyses—oftentimes, this approach includes finding companies with above-average growth potential, wide competitive moats, reasonable valuations and/or identifiable catalysts to unlock shareholder value.
The non-US opportunity set for equities is also larger and generally less researched. With ~40K companies outside of the US (vs. ~4K in the US), a bottom-up oriented strategy could cast a wider net when not constrained by an index’s set universe. Compared to US companies, other developed market companies are covered, on average, by two fewer sell-side analysts and three less for those in emerging markets. This can enable bottom-up oriented managers to invest in more inefficiently priced companies. When effective, an unconstrained, global approach can enable investors to differentiate returns relative to a benchmark index, as opposed to a passive global strategy, which will generally be in line with its returns. However, with greater reward, may also come greater risk, and investors should do their homework to find the right manager with a track-record of success who will meet their investment criteria.
Contact the Editorial Staff
Have a question or comment? We welcome your feedback. Comments will not be made public, but will be read by a member of our editorial staff.
Thank you for your question or comment.